Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released

On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:33:12PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> ...
>
> > > I think the only reason we haven't deleted /tags yet, is because of
> > > demonstration purposes. :-) It's a nice example of layout.
>
> > if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> > with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> > tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
>
> ...
>
> > would anyone have any objection to this? any reason we shouldn't go
> > back and retroactively tag all the revisions we released as tarballs
> > and continue doing so in the future?
>
> +1 This would be a *very* nice showcase of how you could use tags.

well, i've gone back and tagged everything back to 0.6 (the first
release we gave a version number to). if we could continue to tag
each new release as we make them, i think it would (as fitz says)
provide a good example of how one can use tags for our user community.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                    Remember, any design flaw you're 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net      sufficiently snide about becomes  
http://electricjellyfish.net/     a feature.       -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org