Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:
> > You suggested improving vc-directory. I suspect it would be more
> > fruitful to make pcvs less cvs-dependant.
>
> Oh, complely agree.
>
> (Only suggested improving vc-directory because I didn't realize that
> pcl-cvs was now part of all Emacs distributions.)
Even though pcl-cvs's interface is a better fit for Subversion, I do
hope people will still try out the Subversion back end for VC. At the
height of my pcl-cvs usage, I still found that I used VC for some
commands --- log, diff, etc. VC doesn't make you pull up a directory
listing to do everything. And there's really no reason to exclude one
in favor of the other; Emacs makes it easy to simply use whatever
command suits your fancy at the moment.
Since VC has a reasonably well-defined interface to its back ends,
adding a Subversion back end there was simply the shortest path to
getting something working.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 16 00:22:00 2002