Re: alpha and libsvn_wc churn

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:32:15PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> sussman@tigris.org writes:
> > Author: sussman
> > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:09:46 -0500
> > New Revision: 2524
> >
> > Reverting all of the issue #749 changes (the libsvn_wc access-baton
> > rewrite stuff.)
>
> Shockingly, this was a trivial reversion. I got only one (C)onflicted
> file, and it was just in some header-file definitions. Then I
> compiled and passed 'make check' without a single hitch.

If you and Philip are comfortable that this was a successful reversion, then
let's go with it. Philip?

> So here are two possible paths to take:
>
> 1. leave out the libsvn_wc access-baton stuff, and try to release
> Alpha on Thursday.

Let's do this one, provided Philip feels we backed out "enough" and
properly.

> 2. put the access-baton stuff back in, and try to release sometime
> next week, hopefully Monday.
>
> If we decide to go with option #1, then by all means, we should just
> copy the HEAD of /trunk to a branch, and then revert r2524 on the
> branch, so you guys can keep debugging access-batons.

No need to revert your 2524. Just copy 2523 (as Philip suggested).

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org