RFC: a human-eye date format everyone can love
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-06-24 19:17:38 CEST
Please read "RFC" as "Request For Consensus"... :-)
Now that Hadaka has committed the bulk of the new date output code, we
"Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:36:04 -0500"
...but we all know this is just a placeholder until we figure out what
"2002-06-24 10:36:04 -0500 (Mon 24 Jun)"
The goal of this format is to start with an ISO-8601 section (and
Automatic parsers will only read as many chars as they need, since
Furthermore, since the second section is ignored by automatic
The main disadvantage here is that this format is slightly longer than
NOTE: If I made any errors in formatting the first part of the date
Thoughts?,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.