Re: Repository back up, but working copy re-checkout needed

"Ronald V. Simmons" <Van@thesimmonses.net> writes:

> actually my windows clients were upgraded to R2196 on Friday (post
> the dump/load conversion you helped me with last week, Ben) and some
> of them have been complaining today of this problem. I just hadn't
> had time to look closely into it and put it down to their standard
> whingeing. It's pretty amusing to be this bleeding edge. :^)
> Anyway, I suspect that fixes both post and R2092 will be needed on
> the client side and that might make the branching structure a bit
> more complicated..

Huh? Why would we need to put the fix on the pre-2092 branch? That
branch is only for fixing bugs in 'svnadmin dump'.

The bug we're talking about fixing is in the svn client: making the
svn client automatically detect-and-regenerate invalidated opaque url
caches, so that an old working copy can be updated by a newer
repository.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 18 00:18:49 2002