Re: Repository back up, but working copy re-checkout needed

actually my windows clients were upgraded to R2196 on Friday (post the dump/load conversion you helped me with last week, Ben) and some of them have been complaining today of this problem. I just hadn't had time to look closely into it and put it down to their standard whingeing. It's pretty amusing to be this bleeding edge. :^) Anyway, I suspect that fixes both post and R2092 will be needed on the client side and that might make the branching structure a bit more complicated..

rvs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman@collab.net>
To: "Ronald V. Simmons" <Van@thesimmonses.net>
Cc: "Subversion Dev list" <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Repository back up, but working copy re-checkout needed

> "Ronald V. Simmons" <Van@thesimmonses.net> writes:
>
> > It would still be extremely helpful to go ahead and commit the fix.
> > Many of us have repositories and clients which are suffering from
> > the exact same problem. I can build and deploy an svn client (since
> > I don't have modified svn code in my local tree I don't mind the new
> > svn co so much) and that will alleviate the bigger problem for me.
>
> Yes, I suspect gstein will read this, and quickly write a followup
> change to r1863. Just guessing.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 18 00:07:53 2002