Re: more fallout from rev 2024?

On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 10:19, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > The other big advantage is that big projects aren't going to use svn
> > unless it can integrate with tinderbox, and associated tools. So doing
> > the work for svn is a good way to start on this.
>
> Hunh. Are you talking about
>
> Using tinderbox to check the status of Subversion itself
>
> or
>
> Integrating Subversion and Tinderbox so that projects in Subversion
> can more easily use Tinderbox to check their own status

Both.

1. Tinderbox is useful, independent of it's integration with CVS.
Thus, Subversion could profitably use Tinderbox to check its own
status.

2. Tinderbox is even more useful in conjunction with CVS (and esp. with
the other Mozilla-derived tools such as Bonsai). In order for
subversion to replace CVS, it will have to have this same integration.

My suggestion was that performing this integration would make (1) more
useful, and achieve (2).

-- 
sam th						OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC
"Life is polynomial time." -- Laszlo Babai
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org