[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 1919 - trunk/subversion/clients/cmdline

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-05-10 14:43:31 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:

> The code for APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS isn't
> really used anywhere because it's a bad way to do things. It's
> fine, but I'd rather not set a precedent for that. -- justin

Are you saying that the second value tested by the
APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS macro will never occur? That it is always
correct to test against zero? If so I assume the macros in
apr_errno.h should be changed.

Subversion currently has a mixture of APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS and
explict tests. I much prefer consistency, would it be OK to change
all Subversion's APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS() uses into explict tests?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 10 14:44:28 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.