[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ISO-8601 dates and issue 614

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-05-07 17:08:09 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >Though I would really like to get some kind of an answer that what do
> >we want to do with the old style svn_time_to_nts things - is there
> >something worth keeping there?
> Assuming you provide a script to convert the WC, I don't think
> so. It's not worth keeping the month/day name parsing there -- that
> should go into apr_strptime.

I think we can do this without a grand wc conversion.

The format currently in .svn/entries is instantly distinguishable from
the format we want in the future. Thus, the conversion function that
*reads* .svn/entries timestamps merely needs some compatibility code
for a while (a few months, whatever). The writers, of course, would
just start using the new format as soon as the two-format-accepting
reader is in place.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 7 17:09:26 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.