[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs dump/restore proposal

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-04-25 01:18:05 CEST

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> > I almost added that we also don't need to dumping revision subranges
> > right now, but of course that's so trivial that we might as well get
> > it in the first pass. :-)
> Right. And loading into a repository with existing data is trivial, and
> loading at a specified root is trivial.
> Dumping subtrees might get more complicated, though, because of the
> referencing issues, so I'd agree with you and punt. Dumping subranges could
> be difficult because of the referencing again, so you may need to punt
> subranges, too.

Sure. Anything that turns out to be trivial, we do. Just saying,
let's decide the feature set we _need_, and then demand that anything
beyond that be low-hanging fruit, as the saying goes.

> In any case: I'm guessing that Ben has more than enough info to move onto
> designing a concrete format and start some coding...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 25 01:17:17 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.