[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn filesystem without Berkeley DBM?

From: Glenn Thompson <gthompson_at_cdr.net>
Date: 2002-03-10 19:15:03 CET

Greg Hudson wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Glenn Thompson wrote:
> > I'm going to continue on with my internal development as long as possible. But
> > assuming I don't get pulled in another direction I will want to give a sql
> > based fs a try.
> > Does the list have some sort of collective opinion on how they would like to
> > see "function" indirection implemented?
> > You mentioned a vtable. Did you have something specific in mind?
> Look at the way we handle multiple repository implementations in
> libsvn_ra and svn_ra.h. Presumably we'd want to do something similar for
> libsvn_fs.

Will do as soon as I get back home.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 10 19:15:43 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.