[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn filesystem without Berkeley DBM?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2002-03-10 18:59:42 CET

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Glenn Thompson wrote:
> I'm going to continue on with my internal development as long as possible. But
> assuming I don't get pulled in another direction I will want to give a sql
> based fs a try.
> Does the list have some sort of collective opinion on how they would like to
> see "function" indirection implemented?
> You mentioned a vtable. Did you have something specific in mind?

Look at the way we handle multiple repository implementations in
libsvn_ra and svn_ra.h. Presumably we'd want to do something similar for
libsvn_fs.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 10 19:00:32 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.