[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn filesystem without Berkeley DBM?

From: Brian Huddleston <brianh_at_huddleston.net>
Date: 2002-03-08 16:29:43 CET

> > > MySQL 3.23. :-)
> > It's GPL'd, and besides, the BDB backend wasn't stable enough until
around

Ah that *is* a good reason...back when I was working with it they had a
different license.

> > 3.23.34, and InnoDB didn't exist until 3.23.34
> > 3.23 wasn't declared stable until Jan, 2001 according to mysql's news
> > releases.
>
> And we started the FS in summer of 2000.

Heh...this is from the guys using the head of the apache tree? :-)

The mySQL guys have a much tougher view of what constitutes stable that most
open source projects. Their "beta" is equivalent to most people's 1.0.

> > MySQL 4.0 is what has libmysqld anyway. It's a new feature of 4.0 to
> > support an embedded server.
>
> Cool. That would probably make a great reference point for SVN 2.0 FS
> redevelopment.

Sound cool to me.

-Brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Mar 9 00:03:24 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.