[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

use reply-to? (was: conflicts, history, and the Principle Of Least Surprise)

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-02-20 22:07:04 CET

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:56:36PM -0800, Sean Russell wrote:
> <sigh> I *really* wish the Subversion list would set the Reply-To: header
> back to the list. Which is more common: replying only to the person, or
> replying to the list?

"Deal with it"

I'm sure we've all seen the various "considered harmful" documents, so I
won't repeat it here. Suffice it to say, that the prevailing opinion [of
those in charge of the list :-)] take the side of Reply-to munging as being
harmful.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:09 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.