[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion 0.9 (release candidate 1) posted

From: Jay Freeman \(saurik\) <saurik_at_saurik.com>
Date: 2002-02-15 03:42:38 CET

Anything that requires modifying the log file (whatever that is) won't
work without those changes (which I believe includes the update
command). The changes are quite straight forward (simply added a call
to svn_io_set_file_read_write() in four places of the code). It is the
continuation of the patch that I submitted earlier this week that made
checkout work.

Jay Freeman (saurik)

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:41 PM
To: Jay Freeman (saurik)
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Subversion 0.9 (release candidate 1) posted

"Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <saurik@saurik.com> writes:
> Karl:
> Did the patch I sent last night as "Fixed a bunch more Win32
> related issues" get in there? It is needed to make some of the test
> cases work. It doesn't fix all of the Windows problems, but it is a
> 100% fix for the ones it was intending to solve (the XML command line
> client tests, svn-test{,2}.sh).

No, they weren't (there were an unusual number of outstanding patches
as of this morning, so we have a choice: try to get them all into the
tarball, possibly destabilizing it more, or roll the tarball without
the patches.).

Are those patches necessary to allow a Windows user to bootstrap to a
working copy?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:08 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.