[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 0.9 (release candidate 1) posted

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-02-15 03:40:50 CET

"Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <saurik@saurik.com> writes:
> Karl:
>
> Did the patch I sent last night as "Fixed a bunch more Win32 permission
> related issues" get in there? It is needed to make some of the test
> cases work. It doesn't fix all of the Windows problems, but it is a
> 100% fix for the ones it was intending to solve (the XML command line
> client tests, svn-test{,2}.sh).

No, they weren't (there were an unusual number of outstanding patches
as of this morning, so we have a choice: try to get them all into the
tarball, possibly destabilizing it more, or roll the tarball without
the patches.).

Are those patches necessary to allow a Windows user to bootstrap to a
working copy?

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:08 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.