Re: Patch command execution

Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org> writes:
> Shouldn't we be using the -N option so we don't try to apply reversed
> /already applied patches (-N = forward patch only, ignore reversed/already
> applied)
> Otherwise, if the change already exists in your local tree, it'll get a
> reject.
>
> Of course, patch isn't perfect (i don't think it'll let you ignore just
> portions of an already applied patch), so maybe this is deliberate?

I think we should pass -N too, but let's give it a day to see if
anyone else realizes some evil consequences of doing so...

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:05 2006