[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Response to Tom's /. article

From: Billy Tanksley <btanksley_at_hifn.com>
Date: 2002-02-06 19:33:23 CET

From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
>Once we get into questions that are purely about Arch and shed no
>light on Subversion, we really are wandering far off the dev list's
>alleged topic. :-) No big deal, but personally I think I'm done with
>this thread, and I hope others will feel the same way.

I think this thread has something more to contribute, and I think that if we
all keep our calm and view this with perspective we'll not only increase our
understanding, but perhaps come up with a document which helps explain why
we're doing what we're doing.

It seems to be the consensus that Subversion is first and foremost a CVS
replacement, and the only reason to use it is if you love and hate CVS,
because it does the same things, but in a rational way.

I think subversion is much more than that, but I will agree that it's a good



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.