Re: svn commit: rev 1080 - trunk/subversion/include trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_delta trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_dav
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-01-28 02:19:48 CET
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:08:25PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
Yup. The svn_stringbuf_t usage poses problems. In many cases, we aren't
A similar issue, but less so, for the ops member.
I'm getting rid of svn_stringbuf_t everywhere we use it for non-accumulating
The only piece of code that accumulates data into window.new_data is the
> 2. Assuming there is a good motivation for the change, I don't see any
Good point. I can change this to make it typesafe, especially since it is
Cheers,
-- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:37:00 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.