Re: Ben, question about adm_ops.c:svn_wc_revert

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> First off, I wrote that code, so let's not expect Ben to know what the
> intention was there. :-)

I can't *wait* till we have "svn blame".

> This portion of code is exactly on the parent of the revert target,
> which is a valid thing to do only if the revert target is not a WC
> root. Why? Because by definition a WC root is either '.' (which you
> really shouldn't be reverting while your inside of it) or a directory
> that is disjoint with respect to its parent in the working copy,
> meaning its parent has no entry for the target of the revert (and
> therefore, we can't exactly update that non-existent entry).

Uh. Ummm.

I'm not seeing the connection between what you say above and the code
in question, but it's probably easier just to talk about it when you
get in.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:59 2006