"Greg Stein" <gstein@collab.net> writes:
> You and Ben are missing my point. The issue seemed to say that people "must"
> do a fresh checkout. Seems that I could keep working quite fine with my
> existing WC.
>
> Yes, it will be "off" and whatnot, but so what?
Oh -- in your original mail, "off" meant "incorrect expansion"?
Yikes. :-)
Suit yourself, I guess. Those people who don't consider this to be
"working quite fine" will want to do a fresh checkout. We'll just
tell people the implications and let them decide.
-K
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:03 PM
> > To: Greg Stein
> > Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> > Subject: Re: [Issue 524] Changed - line-ending conversion and keyword
> > expansion
> >
> >
> > "Greg Stein" <gstein@collab.net> writes:
> > > Why should people do a fresh checkout? Wouldn't the only
> > problem be that the
> > > keyword substitutions are a bit "off"? I certainly don't mind.
> > >
> > > Or will the substitution *require* that created-rev be in the
> > entries file;
> > > therefore, we must do a checkout to ensure that it gets there?
> >
> > The problem will be that the `created-rev' attribute in the entries
> > will be present but wrong. So whether the substitution works when
> > `created-rev' is absent isn't the question -- the real issue is that
> > when created-rev is present but incorrect, then that keyword will get
> > expanded incorrectly as well.
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:55 2006