You and Ben are missing my point. The issue seemed to say that people "must"
do a fresh checkout. Seems that I could keep working quite fine with my
existing WC.
Yes, it will be "off" and whatnot, but so what?
-g
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: Greg Stein
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: [Issue 524] Changed - line-ending conversion and keyword
> expansion
>
>
> "Greg Stein" <gstein@collab.net> writes:
> > Why should people do a fresh checkout? Wouldn't the only
> problem be that the
> > keyword substitutions are a bit "off"? I certainly don't mind.
> >
> > Or will the substitution *require* that created-rev be in the
> entries file;
> > therefore, we must do a checkout to ensure that it gets there?
>
> The problem will be that the `created-rev' attribute in the entries
> will be present but wrong. So whether the substitution works when
> `created-rev' is absent isn't the question -- the real issue is that
> when created-rev is present but incorrect, then that keyword will get
> expanded incorrectly as well.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:55 2006