Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> The alternative is that the first crawler runs over the working copy,
> and the editor builds a temporary working copy. The second crawler
> then runs over this new working copy and a second editor produces the
> required diffs. Now the first crawler/editor is very like the current
> update, and the second is very like the current diff, so I can see how
> this would work. Lots of lovely code reuse into the bargain. There is
> the overhead of constructing a complete working copy, but we need to
> store the hierarchy information somewhere and a working copy is
> probably the simplest way.
>
> In fact writing this has lead me to conclude that the second approach
> is the one to take, having previously been assuming that the first
> would be the one!
Won't this require twice the total repository size in temporary space
if you do a diff starting from the root? That seems like a lot to me.
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:53 2006