Re: PUBLIC POLL: final static VARIABLE
From: Florin Iucha <florin_at_iucha.net>
Date: 2001-11-30 19:11:50 CET
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:24:34AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
You thought it wrong. Take that book and quietly burn it before the OO
"structures with methods" were a convenience ment to lure away people from
> But a class instance is still a
No, it's not a structure. It's an opaque object that exhibits certain
> Why can't you look at the structure's fields? Why do we
He was specifically refering to having "private" attributes that he
> Accessors are for returning
No! Accessors return the values of "properties". If it happens that the
> But maybe Ruby and Java have done away with all that. I'm not up on
Did you mother know? :)
Public attributes would not pass through a code review in any organisation
In our latest project we have adopted the Sun patterns for the XML parser
florin
-- "If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is." 41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.