Re: mv != (cp && rm)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2001-11-28 02:03:04 CET

Mattias Rönnblom <hofors@lysator.liu.se> writes:
> I think what I'm trying to say that there is just one side of a mv
> command, and that changing the name of the node.

In Unix, there is one side.

Subversion is not Unix. In Subversion, it is possible to commit one
side of the operation without committing the other.

What is your suggested behavior?

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:49 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Fogel: "Re: [Issue 566] Changed - Import fails on Win32 due to APR bug/problem"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: Subversion moving problem"
In reply to: Mattias Rönnblom: "Re: mv != (cp && rm)"
Next in thread: Mattias Rönnblom: "Re: mv != (cp && rm)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]