Re: mv != (cp && rm)

From: Mattias Rönnblom <hofors_at_lysator.liu.se>
Date: 2001-11-28 22:00:00 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> Mattias Rďż˝nnblom <hofors@lysator.liu.se> writes:
> > I think what I'm trying to say that there is just one side of a mv
> > command, and that changing the name of the node.
>
> In Unix, there is one side.
>
> Subversion is not Unix. In Subversion, it is possible to commit one
> side of the operation without committing the other.
>
> What is your suggested behavior?
>

I suggest the UNIX-like semantics.

//Mattias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:49 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mattias Rönnblom: "Re: Subversion != your filesystem (was mv != (cp && rm))"
Previous message: Bill Tutt: "RE: hard links (was Re: Subversion != your filesystem (was mv != (cp &&rm)))"
Maybe in reply to: Mattias Rönnblom: "mv != (cp && rm)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]