Looks good overall, although a lot of extra work is being done rather than
using features of the existing functions.
Also: it appears that the wcprops did not get the extension added to them. I
haven't looked into the code, but I still have ".svn/wcprops/foo.c" in my
working copy. So they still appear in a "find" :-)
And I apologize for not reviewing the patch beforehand. I would have seen
the comments below:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 12:26:46PM -0600, kevin@tigris.org wrote:
>...
> --- OLD/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c	Thu Nov 15 12:26:44 2001
> +++ NEW/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c	Thu Nov 15 12:26:44 2001
>...
> @@ -625,12 +625,14 @@
>                                          SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE,
>                                          name->data,
>                                          NULL);
> +      svn_stringbuf_appendcstr(tmp_prop_base, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
>        real_prop_base = svn_wc__adm_path (svn_stringbuf_create ("", pool),
>                                           0, /* no tmp */
>                                           pool,
>                                           SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE,
>                                           name->data,
>                                           NULL);
> +      svn_stringbuf_appendcstr(real_prop_base, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
The above two chunks of code would be simplified by simply placing
SVN_WC__BASE_EXT directly into the svn_wc__adm_path() call. No need for a
second function call to append the extension.
>...
> --- OLD/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c	Thu Nov 15 12:26:45 2001
> +++ NEW/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c	Thu Nov 15 12:26:46 2001
> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@
>  {
>    svn_stringbuf_t *newpath, *basename;
>    svn_path_split (path, &newpath, &basename, svn_path_local_style, pool);
> +  svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
>    return sync_adm_file (newpath,
>                          pool,
>                          SVN_WC__ADM_TEXT_BASE,
Same here.
>...
> +svn_stringbuf_t *
> +svn_wc__text_base_path (const svn_stringbuf_t *path,
> +                        svn_boolean_t tmp,
> +                        apr_pool_t *pool)
>  {
>    svn_stringbuf_t *newpath, *basename;
>    svn_path_split (path, &newpath, &basename, svn_path_local_style, pool);
> -
> +  svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
>    extend_with_adm_name (newpath,
>                          0,
>                          pool,
>                          tmp ? SVN_WC__ADM_TMP : "",
> -                        thing,
> +                        SVN_WC__ADM_TEXT_BASE,
>                          basename->data,
>                          NULL);
And here.
>...
> @@ -714,6 +707,7 @@
>  {
>    svn_stringbuf_t *newpath, *basename;
>    svn_path_split (path, &newpath, &basename, svn_path_local_style, pool);
> +  svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
>    return open_adm_file (handle, newpath, flags, pool,
>                          SVN_WC__ADM_TEXT_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
And here.
Notice a pattern? :-)
(sorry that I didn't get the patch reviewed beforehand :-( )
>  }
> @@ -727,6 +721,7 @@
>  {
>    svn_stringbuf_t *newpath, *basename;
>    svn_path_split (path, &newpath, &basename, svn_path_local_style, pool);
> +  svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
>    return close_adm_file (fp, newpath, write, pool,
>                           SVN_WC__ADM_TEXT_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
And here.
>  }
> @@ -790,8 +785,11 @@
>          return open_adm_file (handle, parent_dir, flags, pool,
>                                SVN_WC__ADM_DIR_PROP_BASE, NULL);
>        else
> -        return open_adm_file (handle, parent_dir, flags, pool,
> -                              SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        {
> +          svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
> +          return open_adm_file (handle, parent_dir, flags, pool,
> +                                  SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        }
Again.
>      }
>    else if (wcprops)
>      {
> @@ -850,8 +848,11 @@
>          return close_adm_file (fp, parent_dir, sync, pool,
>                                 SVN_WC__ADM_DIR_PROP_BASE, NULL);
>        else
> -        return close_adm_file (fp, parent_dir, sync, pool,
> -                               SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        {
> +          svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
> +          return close_adm_file (fp, parent_dir, sync, pool,
> +                                 SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        }
Another
>      }
>    else if (wcprops)
>      {
> @@ -909,8 +910,11 @@
>          return sync_adm_file (parent_dir, pool,
>                                SVN_WC__ADM_DIR_PROP_BASE, NULL);
>        else
> -        return sync_adm_file (parent_dir, pool,
> -                              SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        {
> +          svn_stringbuf_appendcstr (basename, SVN_WC__BASE_EXT);
> +          return sync_adm_file (parent_dir, pool,
> +                                SVN_WC__ADM_PROP_BASE, basename->data, NULL);
> +        }
and yet another...
Cheers,
-g
-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:48 2006