[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 337 - trunk/packages/rpm

From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2001-10-28 12:35:11 CET

On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:37:36PM -0500, David Summers wrote:
>
> Good point about the numbering scheme. I'll switch to that on the next
> release.
>
> I should have been more technically accurate in the message and state that
> the dependency on neon is such that it links to the library as a normal
> library rather than a dynamically shared library (maybe that is not
> intended but that is what is happening now). When do a "ldd /usr/bin/svn"
> on Linux I don't see any mention of neon shared libraries so I took that
> out of the "Requires" statement on the subversion.spec file.

The reason ldd doesn't show it, is that the only part of svn that uses neon
is ra_dav. ra_dav is loaded on demand by svn when it sees an http:, or https
url.

ldd won't show it, but we do need it.
>
> Have I missed something? (Probably).
>
> Thanks,
> - David Summers
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:32:52PM -0500, david@tigris.org wrote:
> > > Author: david
> > > Date: 2001-10-27 17:32 GMT
> > > New Revision: 337
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > trunk/packages/rpm/subversion.spec
> > > Log:
> > > subversion.spec: Subversion has a compile-time
> > > dependency on neon but not a run-time dependency.
> >
> > What?!! Of course we have a runtime dependency.
> >
> > Or is it simply that you're bundling a Neon installation into your RPM? That
> > is, you haven't broken Neon out into its own RPMs yet?
> >
> > >...
> > > @@ -14,14 +13,13 @@
> > > Requires: db3 >= 3.3.11
> > > Requires: expat
> > > Requires: libxml
> > > -Requires: neon
> > > BuildPreReq: apr-devel >= 2001.10.24
> >
> > When APR does a formal release, and is number 1.0.0, then I think you're
> > going to run into some problems with your numbering scheme :-) 2001.10.24
> > is going to look newer (to RPM's --upgrade) than 1.0.0. I might advocate
> > calling those 0.2001.10.24 or somesuch.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -g
> >
> >
>
> --
> David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for upgrades!"
> david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
> PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:46 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.