Good point about the numbering scheme. I'll switch to that on the next
release.
I should have been more technically accurate in the message and state that
the dependency on neon is such that it links to the library as a normal
library rather than a dynamically shared library (maybe that is not
intended but that is what is happening now). When do a "ldd /usr/bin/svn"
on Linux I don't see any mention of neon shared libraries so I took that
out of the "Requires" statement on the subversion.spec file.
Have I missed something? (Probably).
Thanks,
- David Summers
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:32:52PM -0500, david@tigris.org wrote:
> > Author: david
> > Date: 2001-10-27 17:32 GMT
> > New Revision: 337
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/packages/rpm/subversion.spec
> > Log:
> > subversion.spec: Subversion has a compile-time
> > dependency on neon but not a run-time dependency.
>
> What?!! Of course we have a runtime dependency.
>
> Or is it simply that you're bundling a Neon installation into your RPM? That
> is, you haven't broken Neon out into its own RPMs yet?
>
> >...
> > @@ -14,14 +13,13 @@
> > Requires: db3 >= 3.3.11
> > Requires: expat
> > Requires: libxml
> > -Requires: neon
> > BuildPreReq: apr-devel >= 2001.10.24
>
> When APR does a formal release, and is number 1.0.0, then I think you're
> going to run into some problems with your numbering scheme :-) 2001.10.24
> is going to look newer (to RPM's --upgrade) than 1.0.0. I might advocate
> calling those 0.2001.10.24 or somesuch.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:46 2006