[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-21 15:41:35 CEST

cmpilato@collab.net writes:

> Mo DeJong <supermo@bayarea.net> writes:
> > Just to play the devil's advocate here, why would an end user care
> > about having the file mod and prop mod displayed in different
> > fields?
> Just to play advocate to SuperMo, the devil's actual advocate (huh?),
> it's not as if they can request an update of only the textmods or only
> the propmods anyway.

Right. Users have fine-grained control over local mods, so it makes
sense to have a bit more detail displayed there.

Also, when receiving an update, it's nice to see a _U and understand
that only a property changed; or when looking at status output, just
seeing "__" instead of "_ " is useful, because it reminds you which
files have properties at all.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.