Re: svn status proposal
From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-21 15:34:43 CEST
Mo DeJong <supermo@bayarea.net> writes:
> Just to play the devil's advocate here, why would an end user care
Just to play advocate to SuperMo, the devil's actual advocate (huh?),
-- And to play advocate to another really vocal GREat Guy on our list, I know for a fact that I almost never -- very, very rarely -- run `svn st' without the -M flag. The fact of the matter is that if I'm at a point where I'm concerned about being out of date, I run `svn up' and solve that real quick-like. Otherwise, I only want to know what I've messed with (so I can make sure my log-message-in-progress covers all my edits). -- Apologies to Karl for not expressing this offline when we talked yesterday. Hope you feel better soon. Can't handle American pseudo-food any more? :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.