[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-21 15:34:43 CEST

Mo DeJong <supermo@bayarea.net> writes:

> Just to play the devil's advocate here, why would an end user care
> about having the file mod and prop mod displayed in different
> fields?

Just to play advocate to SuperMo, the devil's actual advocate (huh?),
it's not as if they can request an update of only the textmods or only
the propmods anyway.

--
And to play advocate to another really vocal GREat Guy on our list, I
know for a fact that I almost never -- very, very rarely -- run `svn
st' without the -M flag.  The fact of the matter is that if I'm at a
point where I'm concerned about being out of date, I run `svn up' and
solve that real quick-like.  Otherwise, I only want to know what I've
messed with (so I can make sure my log-message-in-progress covers all
my edits).
--
Apologies to Karl for not expressing this offline when we talked
yesterday.  Hope you feel better soon.  Can't handle American
pseudo-food any more? :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.