[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status proposal

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-09-21 15:34:43 CEST

Mo DeJong <supermo@bayarea.net> writes:

> Just to play the devil's advocate here, why would an end user care
> about having the file mod and prop mod displayed in different
> fields?

Just to play advocate to SuperMo, the devil's actual advocate (huh?),
it's not as if they can request an update of only the textmods or only
the propmods anyway.

And to play advocate to another really vocal GREat Guy on our list, I
know for a fact that I almost never -- very, very rarely -- run `svn
st' without the -M flag.  The fact of the matter is that if I'm at a
point where I'm concerned about being out of date, I run `svn up' and
solve that real quick-like.  Otherwise, I only want to know what I've
messed with (so I can make sure my log-message-in-progress covers all
my edits).
Apologies to Karl for not expressing this offline when we talked
yesterday.  Hope you feel better soon.  Can't handle American
pseudo-food any more? :-)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.