[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should we always report_revisions?

From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2001-09-17 16:06:05 CEST

On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:07:48AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Some of Kevin's patch was for mod_dav_svn -- I'm not prepared to
> commit those portions of the change yet, as I believe it's probably
> more hacks and kludges for anchors/targets. I think I know now how to
> properly solve the problems related to anchors/targets, so I'm a-gonna
> do it. Sorry, Kevin, hope you don't mind.
>
Like I said before, they were a (slightly more effective) kludge to the
hackery already in there. If you have solution that doesn't require looking
at the last character of the REPORT line sent to apache the I'm all for it!!

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.