On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:08:09PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> It's one thing to have a layer which rejects a commit because its
> improperly indented. It's another to have a layer which reformats the
> commit, unbeknownst to the committer, on its way from working copy to
> repository. :-) Detection and correction are very different things.
Apparently you missed my point that RCS, CVS, and virtually every
other version control system on the planet already does this with
keyword expansion and nobody thinks that is a design defect. On the
contrary, they find it very useful. Do you not think keyword
expansion is useful? I see this as nothing more than the
generalization of a hacked implementation of a feature already extant,
wide spread, and virtually expected. Obviously opinions differ :-)
Justus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:33 2006