[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: libsvn_wc ...

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2001-06-10 17:01:06 CEST

>> We all agreed that the *correct* solution is to hang a vtable off of
>> the top-level pool instead of a stream. Whenever a library wants to
>> send a new kind of feedback to the client app, we can add new vtable
>> func.

I expect to be overruled here, but: I think this is a recipe for
spaghetti. Pools are about memory allocation, not feedback.
Overloading them because they happen to get passed to lots of
functions is asking for trouble.

(No, I don't have a super-clever better idea.)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:31 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.