Re: CVS update: MODIFIED: libsvn_wc ...

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 08:15:13AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > Woah, woah, woah...
> >
> > "send bytes" ... this design is predicated on sending an arbitrary set of
> > human-readable bytes, and expecting the stream to get them to the
> > person.
>
> Perhaps you missed that next paragraph that translates to: "I know
> this method ain't the greatest. There's a better one to be found in
> v-tables." ??

Heh. I did :-) Guess I shouldn't read/send email while drunk :-)

> Regardless, that's not to say there's no value in having a library
> feedback stream. Consider CVS in "trace mode" (or whatever that
> ultra-verbose mode is).

A trace/debug mode is a separate beast. It isn't a required part of the
actual functionality of SVN. Telling people about unversioned items is
important and needs to be called out (via a vtable).

>...
> Whatever. The part of that commit related to a feedback stream is
> easily revertable.

Dunno; your call. Do you want/need to keep it for trace/debug output?

> The breakout of pool stuff into their own header
> file is something that should have been done a long time ago anyway.

Sure. Wasn't worried about that :-)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org