[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

thoughts on self-hosting SVN

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: 2001-05-14 10:36:45 CEST

Hi guys

I know M3 includes SVN being self-hosted, with the SVN sources within SVN

Have anyone put any thoughts on doing some kind of duplicate storage in both
CVS and SVN (like a script that takes the comments and commits in both

It would:

a) reduce the amount of troubles for newcomers that have CVS clients
   installed locally and want to get the SVN source. Otherwise, they'll have
   to fetch a tarball/binary first, only to install a SVN client and then get
   the source to re-install the client (and possibly the server).

b) offer the reliability of CVS in case something in SVN would blow up

Possibly, (a) can be substituted by automaticly generated tarballs or

      Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:30 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.