Re: CVS update: subversion/subversion/libsvn_wc adm_ops.c
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2001-03-10 01:45:08 CET
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:35:20PM -0000, sussman@tigris.org wrote:
If WC returns a "struct svn_wc_bump_baton *", then you don't need to make it
>...
Hmm. Isn't it more correct to say that the client library passes this
[ I believe the theory is that no RA module ever calls a WC function; that
> + Eventually, the "track" editor's close_edit() routine needs to call
Why does the track editor need to do anything? From the comment above, it
Cheers,
-- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.