[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Berkeley DB 3.2.9

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2001-03-02 23:48:53 CET

Okay --- as of the change I just committed to nodes-table.c, the
Subversion filesystem now requires Berkeley DB 3.2.9. And with some
other changes I'll be committing in a few minutes, it actually works.

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:

>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:41:23PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com> writes:
> >...
> > > Should we simply require Berkeley DB 3.2.9, and declare 3.1.17
> > > obsolete?
> >
> > I think so. Temporary inconvenience for us now, but it is after all
> > the wave of the future...
> >
> > If you want to check in that patch (I think you forgot to include it
> > in your mail), upgrading shouldn't be too painful for the rest of us.
> > All tests are known to pass w/ the patch and BDB 3.2.9, right?
>
> +1 on upgrading. Let's take the hit before M2.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
>
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:25 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.