Re: Berkeley DB 3.2.9

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:41:23PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com> writes:
>...
> > Should we simply require Berkeley DB 3.2.9, and declare 3.1.17
> > obsolete?
>
> I think so. Temporary inconvenience for us now, but it is after all
> the wave of the future...
>
> If you want to check in that patch (I think you forgot to include it
> in your mail), upgrading shouldn't be too painful for the rest of us.
> All tests are known to pass w/ the patch and BDB 3.2.9, right?

+1 on upgrading. Let's take the hit before M2.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/