On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:41:23PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Jim Blandy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Should we simply require Berkeley DB 3.2.9, and declare 3.1.17
> > obsolete?
> I think so. Temporary inconvenience for us now, but it is after all
> the wave of the future...
> If you want to check in that patch (I think you forgot to include it
> in your mail), upgrading shouldn't be too painful for the rest of us.
> All tests are known to pass w/ the patch and BDB 3.2.9, right?
+1 on upgrading. Let's take the hit before M2.
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:24 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev