[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] svn_fs_revision_prop and friends

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2001-03-01 17:28:42 CET

Yoshiki's function works on binary data. At the moment, we place no
constraints on property names.

I'm willing to restrict property names somewhat, but not too much.
Excluding the null byte would be okay. Using UTF-8 in Normalization
form C would be okay. (And I think that would mean we could carry
them in cleartext in XML, right?)

What do people think about this?

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> Yoshiki Hayashi <yoshiki@xemacs.org> writes:
> > +/* Return true iff SKEL is an atom whose data is the same as STR. */
> > +int svn_fs__atom_matches_string (skel_t *skel, svn_string_t *str);
> Is this really necessary? Can't you just call
> svn_fs__matches_atom (skel, string->data)
> Remember than svn_string_t's are guaranteed to be null-terminated, so
> you can use them as char *'s effortlessly.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:24 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.