final(?) word till post-M2 (was: Re: URLs again)
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2001-02-17 10:08:53 CET
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 02:38:37AM -0600, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
IMO, it doesn't and it shouldn't.
That said, read further. [I've thought of something earlier this evening,
> picture a scenario where we can have it both ways--the URL can be
The above is actually needed. The WC *will* need to know the "canonical"
Rationale: given http://www.webdav.org/projects/neon/ and .../mod_dav/, how
Thus, the WC will internally have to record some kind of identifier or URL
However, the URL itself will not have that information. Only the server
So... my position regarding exposing repositories in URLs remains: they
I'm going to put something into STACK as mark it as TBD. The work and design
Cheers,
-- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:22 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.