[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs progress, and question for JimB/Branko

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2001-02-14 15:30:29 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@galois.ch.collab.net> writes:
> Yay Jim! Those are some meaty commits I see coming down the wire. :-)
> Branko too. The fs is really moving... <purr>
> I too am feeling joyful in the filesystem lately (my commits may not
> be as big, sniff, but remember, happiness cannot be gauged in bytes.)
> Today was dag.c:svn_fs__dag_clone_root, and the new code depends on
> the as-yet-unimplemented functions
> svn_fs__get_node_revision()
> svn_fs__create_successor()
> which are in rep.c, which is commented out of the build temporarily,
> due to interface changes.
> So I'm thinking my next step will be to make rep.c work again, with
> the above two functions first priority.
> Should it come back as node-rev.c, or should node-rev.h become rep.c?
> (The interface currently exported by node-rev.h seems to be
> implemented in rep.c.)

Just move the code over into node-rev.c. "rep" suggests
"representation", but while the module *works* with representations,
its job is to provide an interface which deals with node revisions, so
node-rev is a better name.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:22 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.