Karl Fogel <kfogel@galois.ch.collab.net> writes:
> Yay Jim! Those are some meaty commits I see coming down the wire. :-)
> Branko too. The fs is really moving... <purr>
>
> I too am feeling joyful in the filesystem lately (my commits may not
> be as big, sniff, but remember, happiness cannot be gauged in bytes.)
> Today was dag.c:svn_fs__dag_clone_root, and the new code depends on
> the as-yet-unimplemented functions
>
> svn_fs__get_node_revision()
> svn_fs__create_successor()
>
> which are in rep.c, which is commented out of the build temporarily,
> due to interface changes.
>
> So I'm thinking my next step will be to make rep.c work again, with
> the above two functions first priority.
>
> Should it come back as node-rev.c, or should node-rev.h become rep.c?
> (The interface currently exported by node-rev.h seems to be
> implemented in rep.c.)
Just move the code over into node-rev.c. "rep" suggests
"representation", but while the module *works* with representations,
its job is to provide an interface which deals with node revisions, so
node-rev is a better name.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:22 2006