[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

fs progress, and question for JimB/Branko

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2001-02-13 23:28:13 CET

Yay Jim! Those are some meaty commits I see coming down the wire. :-)
Branko too. The fs is really moving... <purr>

I too am feeling joyful in the filesystem lately (my commits may not
be as big, sniff, but remember, happiness cannot be gauged in bytes.)
Today was dag.c:svn_fs__dag_clone_root, and the new code depends on
the as-yet-unimplemented functions


which are in rep.c, which is commented out of the build temporarily,
due to interface changes.

So I'm thinking my next step will be to make rep.c work again, with
the above two functions first priority.

Should it come back as node-rev.c, or should node-rev.h become rep.c?
(The interface currently exported by node-rev.h seems to be
implemented in rep.c.)

Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:22 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.