Re: PATH_MAX problem

On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:37:25PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:40:41AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:58:24AM -0500, pete collins wrote:
> > > I manually addd this to `target.c'
> > >
> > > Is this acceptable? (The number is 255 BTW)
> >
> > Well, sort of. It works as a temporary fix, until the APR stuff is in
> > place. Eventually, (hopefully later today, APR will be able to discover
> > that you have _POSIX_PATH_MAX but not PATH_MAX, and it will define
> > APR_PATH_MAX appropriately. At that point I will change target.c so that
> > it uses APR's stuff.
>
> It's there now.
>
> APR_PATH_MAX

And has been incorporated into SVN since 13 Feb 2001 2:34 EST, according
to ls -l.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~