Re: PATH_MAX problem

On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:40:41AM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:58:24AM -0500, pete collins wrote:
> > I manually addd this to `target.c'
> >
> > Is this acceptable? (The number is 255 BTW)
>
> Well, sort of. It works as a temporary fix, until the APR stuff is in
> place. Eventually, (hopefully later today, APR will be able to discover
> that you have _POSIX_PATH_MAX but not PATH_MAX, and it will define
> APR_PATH_MAX appropriately. At that point I will change target.c so that
> it uses APR's stuff.

It's there now.

APR_PATH_MAX

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/