On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 07:15:45AM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
> > Any reason we didn't move the client tests to the tests directory?
>
> Yes. The command-line client test suite is just a shell script that
> runs the client binary -- it doesn't link against the testing
> framework, and it's convenient (development-wise) to have it right
> there in a subdirectory. Later, when we are much less frequently
> tweaking those tests and running them during development, I think it
> will make sense to move them into the generic test location anyway,
> but at the moment it doesn't seem worthwhile. (Perhaps the same could
> have been said for the fs tests, but one difference is that the fs
> tests *do* link against the test framework.)
Sounds good to me
>
> On a semi-related note, someday the client/ directory will be moved to
> clients/command-line or something similar, to bring it in line with
> the other clients.
>
+ 1 for this. Now a question. Assuming we have subversion/clients/*,
subversion/tests/*, why do we not have subversion/libs/*, etc? Just a
question, following this line of thought to its logical conclusion.
--
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson
kevin@pilch-bisson.net
http://www.pilch-bisson.net
PGP Public Key At http://pgp.pilch-bisson.net
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:20 2006