Re: WinSVN: Sources of Material

Mark Murphy wrote:

> The first one (VB runtimes) is unavoidable, and the second is being remedied. The VBAccelerator.com code is the only piece in question.
>
> Thoughts?

The one thing I'm concerned about here (besides licencing problems, but
I see you're keeping on top of that) is avoiding the DLL explosion you
usually get with Windows programs.

The question here is: How many different DLLs will we have to install
(and maintain) for a Windows GUI client?

We want to avoid DLL versioning problems at all costs. I'd even lean
towards static linking, at least for the client, where the libraries are
relatively small.

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM:   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/