Re: [PATCH] apr_getopt_long interface update and interleaving support

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> Presuming that it will be similar to Apache, then the log message only needs
> to describe the change. We don't require details of each function changed
> (since that can be seen in the change itself). In essence, the log messages
> describes the semantics of the change, the diff provides the detail.

(Thanks, now I know.)

> [ which is my personal preference, too; the per-func detail changes
> requested by SVN are a bit much for me, but I deal :-) ]

Understood, and thanks for dealing. :-)

(In defense of the system, I can only say that those details have been
useful on several occasions. Jim Blandy may be able to provide
corroborating experiences form his work on the Cygnus/GNU tool chain,
I don't know.)

> Karl: I'll defer the commit to you... seems like you raised your hand first
> :-)

Okay. What, you have other things to do? :-)

Please review the commit after I make it, in case any of the concerns
you mentioned in your last email are left unaddressed.

-K
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:15 2006