[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2000-11-20 23:01:29 CET

> If name is null, then there's no long opt. If val is null, then
> there are no short opts.

So if "val" is NULL, how does apr_getopt_long communicate to the
caller which long option was returned?
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:15 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Fogel: "Re: APR has moved repository, please tweak your working copies..."
Previous message: rbb_at_covalent.net: "Re: APR has moved repository, please tweak your working copies..."
In reply to: Karl Fogel: "Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()"
Next in thread: Karl Fogel: "Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.