[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-11-20 20:51:14 CET

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> So if "val" is NULL, how does apr_getopt_long communicate to the
> caller which long option was returned?

Sorry -- we need a field to hold that int value, yes.

Keep `val', but add const char *short_equivs, I meant.

-K
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:15 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Greg Stein: "Re: APR has moved repository, please tweak your working copies..."
Previous message: Karl Fogel: "Re: APR has moved repository, please tweak your working copies..."
Maybe in reply to: Karl Fogel: "RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()"
Next in thread: Greg Hudson: "Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()"
Reply: Greg Hudson: "Re: RFC on interface change to apr_getopt_long()"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.